Cenciarelli, Carlo

The Case Against Nyman Revisited: ‘Affirmative’ and ‘Critical’ Evidence in Michael Nyman’s Appropriation of Mozart
Post comments on this article below.
Click here to return to the article.


One comment

  1. It is asserted that In Re Don Giovanni is based on the first sixteen bars of the Leporello’s aria – but this is not true. It is the first fifteen bars only. This may seem a trivial point, but I do not think it is. The lack of the “expected” sixteenth bar is one of the things which gives the piece its slight feeling of unpredictability.

    Another point is that each of the four sets of fifteen bars is repeated, so there is a feeling of statis, which neatly counterbalances the steadily increasing fullness of the music – it is not A B C D but A A B B C C D D.

    Another point is the order that the four elements are introduced – by starting with the inner repeated quavers, followed by bass, counter-melody and only then “main tune”, the general perception of what is important about the music is subverted. But notivce that the ‘chugging’ quavers of the piece do not disappear, but remain, just like the opening snare drum rhythm is Ravel’s Bolero.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s